Skeletal muscle physiology, organ communication & integrative exercise physiology and low back pain.
Skeletal muscle tissue is one of the most plastic tissues in the human body and primarily consists of proteins. Muscle mass depends on the balance between protein synthesis and protein breakdown and is influenced by nutritional status, physical activity, exercise, and injury or pathology. The microscopic architecture of skeletal muscles is characterized by the complex organization of muscle cells (also known as muscle fibers) and the associated connective tissue.
The total cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle is usually determined by the number and CSA of the muscle fibers within that muscle. Muscle surface area can be altered by pathological changes, such as the infiltration of fat and connective tissue between muscle fibers. Skeletal muscles are characterized by the organization of the individual skeletal muscle fibers that compose the muscle.
Skeletal muscles contain different types of muscle fibers. The composition of the skeletal muscle fibers is crucial for the metabolic and functional properties of the muscle. The ability of a muscle to respond to various functional demands is due to this heterogeneous composition of skeletal muscle fibers. The composition of skeletal muscle fibers is characterized by a high degree of plasticity, with inactivity and physical activity as the main regulators.
Within the REVAL research group, Prof. Dr. Frank Vandenabeele and his team have developed extensive expertise in studying the microscopic characteristics of skeletal muscle fibers (using immunofluorescence) in muscle samples obtained from healthy subjects and various patient populations (MS, DM, obesity, COPD, low back pain, COVID, cancer). These structural muscle properties are studied in relation to the functional properties of these muscles and muscle volume (determined by 3D free-hand ultrasound). Muscle samples are obtained using a "fine needle" biopsy technique, guided by ultrasound.
Each individual is made up of trillions of cells, which communicate with their environment but also internally to enable specific tasks and collaboration between cells. The cooperation between cells within a certain tissue, and even between cells in different tissues, is key for our bodily functions. This crosstalk is organized in many ways, hormones being the best known example. It has recently been shown that cells also communicate via the secretion of small bubble-like structures, called extracellular vesicles, which can be released by all body cells. The content of these cellular vesicles more or less reflect the state of the sender (cell of origin) and the processes that happening within this cell. The extracellular vesicles, and in particular their content, may in turn influence the behaviour and/or metabolism of the recipient cells.
During physical exercise, these extracellular vesicles are also prominent (e.g. in the bloodstream). Skeletal muscle is considered an important source of circulating extracellular vesicles during exercise. To date, the relative contribution of different metabolically important tissues to the circulating extracellular vesicles and their destination is largely unknown. Research on the role of exercise and/or exercise training and their relation to extracellular vesicles is still in its infancy, a field in which we have recently focused on in our research group.
Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. During the past decade, research mainly focused on psychosocial causes of NSLBP (e.g., fear of movement), thereby reducing interest in biological causes (e.g., back muscle dysfunction).
New insights into the characteristics of back muscles are, however, crucial. Our research group can provide this through our unique complementary expertise with state-of-the-art methods and our pilot results. We hypothesize that patients with NSLBP show alterations in the back muscles at macroscopic (i.e., volume, fat fraction), microscopic (i.e., fiber types), hemodynamic (i.e., oxygenation), and electrophysiological (i.e., activation) level, which are interrelated and underlie impaired back muscle proprioception in this population. This will be examined by three objectives:
This study is funded by FWO (G072122N).