Legal & ethical responsibilities
When using online tools (gen AI, but also online translation platforms or plagiarism checkers) researchers should ensure compliance with data protection and intellectual property laws, ethical standards, and the attribution of AI-assisted work. Failure to do so may lead to unintended legal, ethical, or academic repercussions. If unsure, do not use the tool or contact ai@uhasselt.be.
General-purpose Large Language Models like ChatGPT are trained on broad datasets. Their outputs can be impressive in breadth, but commonly lack the precision and domain-specific expertise that many research tasks require.
As a result, it remains crucial to verify information with reliable academic sources, just as you would with any general online search.
AI-driven research tools utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to support and enhance various aspects of the research process. These tools apply techniques such as machine learning, natural language processing, and data analysis to automate or optimize tasks such as data collection, processing, analysis, and interpretation.
AI-driven research tools
Nonetheless, it remains essential to check results and be transparent about your use of AI tools.
These tools can offer assistance in several fields:
Prompts are open-ended instructions intended to guide responses, typically used in AI models and expressed in natural language. They promote the generation of extended answers, inviting deeper exploration. This sets them apart from traditional queries or specific and targeted search commands. Queries often involve a combination of keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), truncation symbols (*, ?), and string search ("...") and focus on directly retrieving relevant data or information from a system or database.
! For reliable citation data and finding academic publications, traditional scholarly resources like Web of Science or the UHasselt Discovery service remain the most dependable options.
You can find a more detailed overview of specific prompting techniques (e.g. prompt chaining) in this guide.
While AI detection tools may seem useful, their judgment is generally not very reliable. Some tools, like OpenAI's Text Classifier, focus specifically on detecting text generated by their own models (e.g., GPT).
Tools like Turnitin AI Checker, GPTZero, and Copyleaks offer a higher level of reliability due to their extensive databases and more advanced algorithms. However, false positives and negatives remain a common issue, especially if the text is highly structured | written in a style that resembles typical AI outputs (formulaic) or when AI-generated text has been heavily edited by a human.
As AI technology evolves, so too will the reliability of detection tools, but for now, their use should always be supplemented with careful human review to ensure accuracy and fairness.
Using Gen AI as a writing assistant significantly increases the risk of plagiarism. Online checkers have become popular tools for detecting plagiarized content.
The reliability of plagiarism checkers depends on several factors, such as
Larger databases and advanced algorithms can detect paraphrasing and subtle plagiarism. Nonetheless, false positives may occur, e.g. when common phrases or properly cited quotes are flagged as plagiarism.
! User privacy and security: be aware that some online checkers retain user submissions, which could lead to future plagiarism flags or privacy concerns.
Adding AI tools to the reference list of a publication provides a direct way to cite the technologies used. Below you will find some basic guidelines for citing AI in APA style (7th Edition). In-text citation of an AI tool: Author/company or creator of the tool (year of the version used)
Reference list entry for an AI tool: The full reference to the AI tool used should be included in the reference list as follows: Author/company or creator of the tool. (Year of the version used). Name of the tool or model (release date/version number/version name) [Type of AI model]. Retrieved on month day, year, from URL of the tool's website
The citation style (APA, Chicago, Vancouver...) may vary depending on the requirements of each assignment, academic journal, or funding body. |
---|
Generalist AI models can generate text, summarize information, answer questions, and support writing tasks. Tools like Gemini and Edge Copilot are more effective for real-time searches and web-based tasks, while open-source models like Llama allow for customization to specific needs. DeepSeek's R1 model matches or surpasses ChatGPT, MS Copilot, and Gemini in tasks that simulate human language and knowledge. However, its operation under China's regulatory framework may influence content availability and responses on sensitive topics.
In search-based tasks, these models tend to reference broadly accessible general sources rather than scholarly publications, unless specifically prompted to do so. This impacts the accuracy and relevance of their output for academic research, especially on topics needing specialized knowledge or recent data. For reliable academic information, it is recommended to use specialized databases or verified academic publications directly. Any AI outputs should be reviewed carefully.
Model | Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free Version:
Paid Subscription:
|
|
|
|
Free Version:
Paid Subscription:
|
|
|
|
Free Version:
Paid Subscription:
|
|
|
|
Free Version:
Paid Subscription:
|
|
|
|
Free version:
|
AI tools specifically developed for research, are built with a sharper focus on academic tasks. They are designed to filter, organize, and analyze scholarly articles more effectively, offering more reliable literature reviews, source-tracking, and advanced data analysis capabilities tailored to academic workflows. These tools are often further trained with subject-specific or research-oriented datasets. In addition, they commonly employ mechanisms designed to minimize hallucinations and reduce bias.
The lists below are not meant to be exhaustive, but rather aim to give an overview of the possibilities and limitations of AI tools tailored for or used in academic research. Various tools can provide support in the following areas:
The main purpose of the following tools is to help you search for research articles and identify trends. Caution is advised, since occasional citation errors may occur. These tools often use the datasets of repositories such as Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref, and | or Pubmed to source (bibliographical) information. A general rule of thumb is to be wary of any platform that does not clearly indicate where its articles come from. For now, these tools work best as a supplement to traditional database searches.
Several academic publishers and commercial companies are developing their own AI research assistants, integrated into their databases. Examples include Clarivate | ProQuest and Elsevier (Scopus). These tools are often only available through a paid license. They are typically designed to query the respective databases using natural language, summarize the most relevant or highly cited results (or more accurately their metadata), and create visualizations of relationships between publications. UHasselt currently participates in the beta programme for the JSTOR interactive research tool. Legal databases, such as Strada lex (GenIA-L) and LexNow (LexGAIN), have also developed their own AI-powered assistants or are doing so (monKEY). We will keep you updated on further developments.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version only |
|
|
|
Free Version:
Paid Subscription:
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
Free version only |
|
|
|
Free version only |
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version only |
|
Jane (Journal/Author Name Estimator) |
|
|
Free version only |
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
Using software and tools with machine learning algorithms and text-mining techniques to handle large datasets can automate key aspects of systematic reviews, such as screening, data extraction, and synthesis. However, automation comes with risks, like the potential to miss nuanced details that require expert human judgment. Maintaining transparency is essential; protocols or reports should clearly document the tools used, the criteria for their application, and any decisions shaped by automated methods.
For more information on tools that can be used for systematic reviews, please consult our Systematic and Systematized Reviews page (under 'Tools & Software').
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
AI writing assistants can enhance efficiency, clarity, and language precision in academic work. However, they often lack the depth needed for complex topics, may introduce factual errors, and can occasionally risk unintentional plagiarism. Careful review is crucial to maintain accuracy and integrity.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
Tools for summarizing research papers or extracting key information from literature by quickly identifying main ideas, concepts, and findings. However, caution should be exercised when using such tools, as they may not always accurately capture nuances, context, or critical details, potentially leading to oversimplified interpretations or misrepresentations of the original research. Always verify the results with a careful review of the full text.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
Tools that help gather insights and build consensus on research questions or findings by aggregating diverse perspectives and analyzing patterns in academic literature. However, caution should be taken as these tools rely on algorithms and databases that may not fully capture the complexity or evolving nature of research topics, potentially leading to biased or incomplete conclusions. It remains essential to cross-check the findings with original sources and expert evaluation.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
AI transcription can save time and effort in tasks like interview analysis, lecture documentation, and data processing. However, accuracy may be inconsistent, especially with specialized terminology, strong accents, or low-quality recordings, often requiring manual corrections. Ethical concerns about data security and privacy are critical, particularly for sensitive research. While efficient, AI transcription should be used with careful consideration of these limitations to ensure reliability and compliance with academic standards.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Paid subscription only
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
All-round AI tools assisting with a suite of research-related tasks, including writing, discovery, summarization, and data analysis, making the research process more efficient. However, caution is advised when using such tools, as they may sometimes generate content that lacks depth, misinterpret complex concepts, or overlook subtle contextual elements, which could lead to errors or incomplete understanding. Always complement AI-generated outputs with thorough review and expert insight.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
AI tools can automate repetitive tasks, improve code quality, and offer real-time feedback, significantly speeding up software development and enhancing understanding for non-experts. However, they may overlook nuances in complex problems, introduce errors, or even lead to unintentional code plagiarism. Careful review and validation are essential to ensure accuracy, originality, and reliability.
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
|
|
|
|
Available with GPT-4 model access. |
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
Tool |
Main characteristics |
Use & limitations |
Free | Paid subscription |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
Institutional subscription only
|
|
|
|
Institutional subscription only
|
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Paid subscription only |
|
|
|
Free version
Paid subscription
|
|
|
|
Institutional subscription only |
Ithaka S+R curates a regularly updated list of Generative AI tools actively used in post-secondary education and research. The list can also be accessed directly as a Google doc. Ithaka S+R is a division of ITHAKA, the U.S. based organization that also operates JSTOR and helps the academic community use digital technologies to improve global access to knowledge and education.